<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Real Time Hype</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.incoherence.net/v5/2010/02/18/real-time-hype/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.incoherence.net/v5/2010/02/18/real-time-hype</link>
	<description>illuminating nonsense for the interwebs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:38:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: allen</title>
		<link>http://www.incoherence.net/v5/2010/02/18/real-time-hype/comment-page-1#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 02:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.incoherence.net/v5/?p=727#comment-148</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s it, I&#039;m disabling comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s it, I&#8217;m disabling comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yar</title>
		<link>http://www.incoherence.net/v5/2010/02/18/real-time-hype/comment-page-1#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>yar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 02:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.incoherence.net/v5/?p=727#comment-147</guid>
		<description>first! 

srsly though - good analysis.  With sites such as digg (I esp like the aggregator originalsignal.digg.com) it&#039;s always interesting to read commentary, but it&#039;s difficult to discern the armchair quarterbacks from the pros - that is, the everyman providing his feedback vs experts in the field.  I think the advent of web2.0/3.0 will blur the line a little.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>first! </p>
<p>srsly though &#8211; good analysis.  With sites such as digg (I esp like the aggregator originalsignal.digg.com) it&#8217;s always interesting to read commentary, but it&#8217;s difficult to discern the armchair quarterbacks from the pros &#8211; that is, the everyman providing his feedback vs experts in the field.  I think the advent of web2.0/3.0 will blur the line a little.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

